This webinar on the topic of bioidentical hormone replacement therapy for women was presented on Thursday, March 15, 2012. Information on future webinars is posted at www.drbloem.com/webinars/
http://www.drbloem.com/wp-content/uploads/videos/bhrtwebinar120315.flvPlease clear your web browser’s cache if you have difficulty playing the webinar.
From Mercola.com – November 28, 2011
The HPV vaccine is NOT harmless like it is being promoted and has not been proven to actually prevent cervical cancer
The HPV vaccine only protects against TWO strains of HPV associated with cancer but there are MORE THAN 100 different strains of HPV in all.
Dr. Diane Harper, one of the lead researchers for Gardasil blew the whistle on the vaccine, saying the available data suggests the HPV vaccine’s protective effects do not last beyond five years.
The VAERS database continues to swell with reports of autoimmune disorders contracted after receiving the HPV vaccine. These side effects now include 137 reports of cervical dysplasia, and 41 reports of cervical cancer.
HPV infection clears up on its own within two years in 90 percent of all cases. It rarely leads to cervical cancer unless the infection becomes chronic and leads to cervical changes that remain untreated. Routine pap smear testing can identify chronic HPV infection and may provide greater protection against development of cervical cancer than reliance on an HPV vaccine that has not been adequately proven to be safe or effective.
Click here to read the rest of the story.
From NaturalNews.com – September 15, 2011
In seeking answers to why adolescent girls are suffering devastating health damage after being injected with HPV vaccines, SANE Vax, Inc. decided to have vials of Gardasil tested in a laboratory. There, they found over a dozen Gardasil vaccine vials to be contaminated with rDNA of the Human Papillomavirus(HPV). The vials were purchased in the United States, Australia, New Zealand, Spain, Poland and France, indicating Gardasil contamination is a global phenomenon.
This means that adolescents who are injected with these vials are being contaminated with a biohazard — the rDNA of HPV. In conducting the tests, Dr. Sin Hang Lee found rDNA from both HPV-11 and HPV-18, which were described as “firmly attached to the aluminum adjuvant.”
That aluminum is also found in vaccines should be frightening all by itself, given that aluminum should never be injected into the human body (it’s toxic when ingested, and it specifically damages the nervous system). With the added discovery that the aluminum adjuvant also carries rDNA fragments of two different strains of Human Papillomavirus, this now reaches the level of a dangerous biohazard– something more like a biological weapon rather than anything resembling medicine.
As SANE Vax explains in its announcement, these tests were conducted after an adolescent girl experienced “acute onset Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis within 24 hours” of being injected with an HPV vaccine. (http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-inc-dis…)
Please click here to read the rest of the article.
From DrDach.com
In his Iodine book, David Brownstein MD reports three cases of spontaneous regression of breast cancer after iodine supplementation.(1)
(page 63)
The first patient, Joan a 63 year old English teacher, was diagnosed with breast cancer in 1989, declined conventional treatment, and took 50 mg per day of Iodoral, (Iodine). Six weeks later, a PET scan (left image) showed, “all of the existing tumors were disintegrating”.
Please click here to read the rest of the article.
One of my patients wrote the following testimonial:
“I am a 42 year old breast cancer survivor, and I have been struggling with hormonal imbalance and weight issues since completing chemotherapy and to top it all off a hysterectomy over a year ago. I have been searching for a solution other than pharmaceuticals to just feel healthy and alive again after many years of suffering. I have been seeing Dr. Bloem for about a month and I have never felt better. I wish I had met Dr. Bloem 5 years ago.”
Women who are diagnosed with breast cancer often feel like they are stuck between a rock and hard place. Even though there is no evidence that there is any relationship between bioidentical hormone replacement therapy and the development of any kind of cancer, many doctors believe that hormones should be avoided if a patient has been diagnosed with cancer.
Although conventional cancer specialists routinely recommend surgically removing the tumor, infusing the body with toxic chemicals, and therapies that have anti-hormonal effects, increasing numbers of patients have started to question these treatment strategies. One the one hand we know that patients have survived such therapies, but we also know that many have suffered severe adverse reactions, including death. Many who undergo and survive such therapies experience a symptoms of hormone deficiency, causing a dramatically reduced quality of life.
That is why women like this patient choose bioidentical hormonal replacement therapy. This woman is on the Wiley Protocol®, a rhythmically dosed, bioidentical hormone replacement regimen. The results are often life changing, causing symptoms such as depression, dry skin, hair loss, low libido to improve significantly or to resolve completely.
Bioidentical hormones therapy is safe as long as the amounts of hormones used and the levels of hormones in the body are carefully monitored. I recommend the Wiley Protocol, which uses bioidentical estradiol and progesterone in a rhythm that mimics the cyclical fluctuation of hormone levels that we see in healthy young women.
The word bioidentical means that the hormones are exactly the same as the hormones that the human body produces. Bioidentical hormones include estradiol, progesterone, testosterone, cortisol, human growth hormone, thyroxine (T4), and triiodothyronine (T3). I don’t recommend non-bioidentical chemicals such as medroxyprogesterone and norgestimate because they are not produced by the human body and because they have known side effects such as cancer, hypertension, depression, and fluid retention. They are more appropriately referred to hormone disrupting chemicals.
Can bioidentical hormone replacement therapy be used in “asymptomatic perimenopausal or postmenopausal women”?
Yes, they can. Not all women experience hot flashes, night sweats, insomnia, or any of the other classical symptoms of perimenopause. However, sometimes there more subtle changes that occur. These may include decline in memory (“senior moments”), decreased libido or sexual satisfaction, skin changes, hair changes, vaginal dryness, and loss of sense of feminity.
There are two main reasons for recommending bioidentical hormone replacement therapy: 1) Relief of symptoms, 2) Reduction of disease risk. We know that properly dosed and monitored bioidentical hormone replacement is a safe and effective therapy for relieving symptoms of perimenopause. We also know that the risk for heart disease, cancer, osteoporosis, and Alzheimer’s disease increases as people get older and their hormones levels decline. Young people with high hormone levels tend to be at very low risk for these health conditions. There are indications that bioidentical hormone replacement may reduce the risk for developing such health problems and allow people to have a better quality of life.
For how long can bioidentical hormone replacement therapy be used?
Bioidentical hormone replacement therapy can be used for as long as a patient desires. Suzanne Somers is 63 years old and is using the bioidentical Wiley Protocol hormone replacement regimen. She takes very good care of herself in many different ways and it shows! She intends to use this therapy for as long as she lives. Bioidentical hormone replacement therapy can be stopped at any time. This will return the patient to their previous (usually) hormone deficient state.
Does bioidentical hormone replacement therapy increase the risk of cancer?
I have not seen any evidence that it does. Bioidentical hormones such as estradiol and progesterone are a normal part of the human body. Why would the human body produce messenger chemicals that are carcinogenic? I believe that bioidentical hormones are as safe as water as long as they are dosed and monitored correctly. At least 70% of our bodies consists of water. Are we demanding proof or double blind, randomized, placebo controlled studies to prove that water does not cause cancer?
On the other hand, we know that the Women’s Health Initiative Study showed that women using a combination of non-bioidentical chemicals (Premarin and Provera) had an increased risk of heart disease, blood clots, stroke, and breast cancer. These women did NOT receive hormone replacement therapy. Instead they were drugged with chemicals that are not normally found in the human body.
If you are woman who takes oral contraceptives or if you know someone who does, you need to read this. Based on what I know about these pharmaceuticals, I dare to say that any government that values its women would prohibit the use of these dangerous drugs.
The birth control pill was first introduced to the American public for contraceptive use in 1960. By 2002, 11.6 million U.S. women were on the Pill, making it the nation’s leading method of contraception.
But oral contraceptives can have negative health effects. The Pill’s relationship with blood-clot risk and stroke is well-documented, and that risk increases when a woman is a smoker, particularly a smoker over age 35. In addition, studies in recent years have found that birth control pill use:
And the Pill may interfere with a protein that keeps testosterone unavailable for women’s physiologic needs, thus causing long-term health problems, including sexual dysfunction.
Since 2000, death rates have increased in women between the ages of 35 and 44. All other age groups, meanwhile, have seen a decline. Research on this fact cites the significant increase in the use of birth control pills as a possible contributing factor.
Please click here to read the rest of the article.
From NaturalNews.com
Even as 13-year-old Daniel Hauser and his family are dealing with the reality of living in a medical police state that labeled them “fugitives from the law” for refusing chemotherapy, another similar case has taken center stage this week: The case of Billy Best.
At age 16, Billy Best was diagnosed with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, just like Daniel Hauser. Also like Daniel Hauser, he was ordered to undergo chemotherapy. After five rounds of chemo — which he describes as nearly killing him — Billy decided chemo wasn’t right for him, and he refused to submit to more chemo.
Fleeing his parents and medical “authorities,” Billy discovered his own natural treatments for cancer with the help of concerned citizens, and by changing his diet and taking these natural remedies, he was able to heal cancer and save his own life.
Click here to read the article.
From NaturalNews.com
On the issue of Daniel Hauser (the “chemo boy”) who is now on the run with his mother, it turns out that cancer studies are fraudulent to begin with. So the very idea that this boy can be “saved” by chemotherapy is pure junk science.
Read this article to see why even cancer studies published in peer-reviewed medical journals are biased by Pharma money:
Click here to read complete article.
(NaturalNews) Young women who receive radiation treatment after breast cancer surgery are significantly more likely to later develop cancer in the other breast than women who did not undergo such radiation.
The findings come from a study, published online in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, on more than 7,000 women who were treated for breast cancer in Netherlands between the years of 1970 and 1986. All study participants were diagnosed with breast cancer before the age of 71.
Read more here: www.naturalnews.com/026257.html
