Comments on: Hormone Replacement Success – Rhythmic Dosing versus Low-Dose Static Dosing

By: Marie Hart

Marie Hart — Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:39:08 +0000

Hormone Replacement Success – Rhythmic Dosing versus Low-Dose Static Dosing http://t.co/09FhPKOx #health

By: marie hart

marie hart — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 21:22:54 +0000

RT @drbloem: #Hormone #Replacement #Success – #Rhythmic Dosing versus Low-Dose Static Dosing http://t.co/OtDDJ6xA

By: Bernice Barlow

Bernice Barlow — Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:36:57 +0000

RT @drbloem: Hormone Replacement Success – Rhythmic Dosing versus Low-Dose Static Dosing http://t.co/pC2gria7 #health

By: Mark

Mark — Wed, 21 Dec 2011 10:44:47 +0000

Hormone Replacement Success – Rhythmic Dosing versus Low-Dose Static Dosing http://t.co/09FhPKOx #health

By: Savandeal

Savandeal — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 03:50:16 +0000

Hormone Replacement Success – Rhythmic Dosing versus Low-Dose Static Dosing http://t.co/09FhPKOx #health

By: drbloem

drbloem — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 04:16:20 +0000

There are many potential causes and contributing factors with regard to the development of breast cancer, which may include prior use of oral/chemical contraceptives, vaccines, genetically modified foods, nutritionally deficient diets, electromagnetic fields, cell phones, ionizing radiation from mammograms and TSA body scanners, etcetera. However, I believe that all cells in the body have receptors for estrogens, progesterone and other hormones, which explains why they are all responsive to the effects of these hormones. I don't like the term "estrogen dominance" because it makes you believe the levels of estrogens are higher than the levels of progesterone. We know that in the postmenopausal period both estradiol and progesterone levels are low. That explains why when we restore hormone levels to youthful levels and when we restore the hormonal rhythm patients regain their sense of well being. Unfortunately, many doctors believe that bioidentical hormone replacement therapy should be avoided in women with "estrogen receptor positive" tumors even when there is no evidence whatsoever that it cancer is caused by estrogens. Why on earth would the body make hormones if they caused cancer?

By: Dorothy Pugh

Dorothy Pugh — Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:22:47 +0000

This rotation of estrogen and progesterone is very interesting. I have a sneaking suspicion that the alternation of estrogen and progesterone dominance that premenopausal women experience keeps them from getting breast cancer unless they have problem BRCA genes or some other unusual situation. On the other hand, the chance of getting breast cancer rises steadily after menopause. Why is this so? Perhaps because some tumors have estrogen receptors and others progesterone receptors, so tumors are starved or destroyed when one hormone is cut off and another — an antagonist, in fact — takes its place. But postmenopausal women experience continuous estrogen dominance without intervention and get no protection from estrogen-dependent tumors. It's encouraging that this improved this patient's situation. I hope that clinical research will someday explore this further.

By: Alternative News

Alternative News — Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:21:53 +0000

Hormone Replacement Success – Rhythmic Dosing versus Low-Dose Static Dosing http://t.co/TDmJCIUf #health

By: Elizabeth

Elizabeth — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:23:14 +0000

Hormone Replacement Success – Rhythmic Dosing versus Low-Dose Static Dosing http://t.co/09FhPKOx #health

By: Andrea Lewis

Andrea Lewis — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:20:02 +0000

RT @drbloem: Hormone Replacement Success – Rhythmic Dosing versus Low-Dose Static Dosing http://t.co/DH1O0sDQ #health